Adam Buckland wrote: > I did read it but misread "The right response to that would have been to > go in immediately" as involving an invasion. > > Questions and thoughts though: > > 1. What was the drone doing over Iran when it was supposed to be over > Afghanistan? > 2. The US thought it had been smashed to pieces, how did they get that > so wrong? > 3. If they couldn't communicate with it how would they know where it was > to attack it? > 4. Iran claim to have shot it down... if they did surely it would be in > pieces not as a whole > 5. Iran is a sovereign country.. bombing it for no valid reason other > than the military's incompetence would be perceived as an act of war in > many countries and give legitimacy to Iran
Hi Adam, Interesting questions: 1. It was supposed to be on the border at about 50,000 feet. 2. If it had been "shot down" it would have been. They made the mistake of believing Muslims. 3. The released pictures plus existing intelligence information about Iran. But they might be able to communicate with it as well. 4. Yes. 5. Iran is part of the "Axis of Evil". Like shooting a mugger - except to other muggers. > Adam Buckland wrote: >> Yes invade Iran... that'd be a good idea... -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
