I have nothing but contempt for socialists who claim this is the way it is because it would be too onerous to undo what's done. You are building a windmill that is irrelevant. Nothing will be undone. Very few of the things you mention has anything to do with Obama signing the bills passed by Congress. Those things go on no matter who is in charge.
This issue is very important. It will put in place a process that will require jurisdictions to determine eligibility. What a joke that you think Republicans should lose with grace. I guess you don't read U.S. news about the absolute squealing done by DemonCrates when they don't get their way. ----- Original Message ----- From: "geoff" <[email protected]> To: "'ProFox Email List'" <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 3:42 AM Subject: RE: [OT] Georgia Court takes case of Obama citizenship > Apart from the general contempt I feel for people who continually bring > this > non-issue up time and time again I an amused by the notion of what would > happen if Obama were retrospectively disqualified. So come on... tell me > what you think would happen. Let's start with a few facts. > > every bill Obama signed would be rendered immediately void. this also > means > all spending and appropriation bills. That means all that money paid to > federal employees would immediately become repayable in full. The > government > itself would be effectively unconstitutional and cease to exist. All your > welfare payments would have been illegal and subject to immediate > repayment > except of course there would be no federal employees left to take the > money. > They were just all dismissed because there is no money - and has been none > for 3 years - to pay them. Every judicial appointment made would be > unconstitutional thus rendering every judgment they make - civil or > criminal > - invalid and subject to immediate dismissal. All tax payments would be > invalidated as the government mandated with its collection was not in > existence for over 3 years. > > how's that scenario sound to you? worth all the ridiculous postering over > a > 'natural born' distinction that is as idiotic as it is discriminatory? The > reason why there is no judge alive that would rule against the certificate > is that the chaos that would ensue could possibly destroy the nation. > > It is an idiotic pseudo argument made in response to losing an election. > it > is like the 2000 stolen election all over again. You republicans really > ought to learn to lose with grace since you can't govern with competence. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Pete Theisen > Sent: Thursday, 5 January 2012 6:17 PM > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: Re: [OT] Georgia Court takes case of Obama citizenship > > Nicholas Geti wrote: >> http://visiontoamerica.org/6906/breaking-georgia-court-to-hear-natural >> -born-citizen-case-vs-obama/ >> >> >> I doubt that it will do any good but at least some people are still >> trying to make Obama's birth certificate null and void. > >> This case, in Georgia, deals specifically with the Natural Born >> Citizen issue. >> >> In a previous article, we brought up the Minor vs Happersett case from >> 1875 in which the Supreme Court defined a NBC as one who has 2 parents >> which were citizens at the time of the subject's birth. We also cited >> 3 other cases in which the Supreme Court, previous to the Minor case, >> said the same thing. >> >> Since Obama's father, at the time of Barack's birth, was not a U.S. >> citizen, nor did he ever become one, according to the U.S. Supreme >> Court in 1875.Obama is NOT a Natural Born Citizen. >> >> If not a NBC.then, according to the Constitution, Obama is ineligible >> to serve as President. > > Not only his father was not a citizen, his mother was too young to confer > citizenship by birth to a child born outside of the states. > > Should cast some light on the subject. Never mind that he has proven most > inept and the whole business community feels they can't trust him. > I mean, except those on the take. > -- > Regards, > > Pete > http://pete-theisen.com/ > http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/D7F9E1AE30FF47EE87EB36DCFB216EA4@dual ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
