So you really want to believe that laws signed into existence by an ineligible President would remain? do you really think that woudl succeed in the Supreme Court for longer than 5 seconds? The silliness is people who seem to think that they can retrospectively invalidate an entire presidency and think there are no consequences. EVERY executive decision would be invalidated including money supply bills. get a grip. there is NO way it wil lever happen the way you wish.
its a stupid and discriminatory law anyhow and a bit of an embarrassment -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Oke, II Sent: Friday, 6 January 2012 8:27 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Georgia Court takes case of Obama citizenship I love hearing from constitutional scholars that have no clue what they are talking about. Don't let that stop you from rambling on tho, Geoff. Michael Oke, II 661-349-6221 Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient. On Jan 5, 2012, at 12:42 AM, "geoff" <[email protected]> wrote: > Apart from the general contempt I feel for people who continually > bring this non-issue up time and time again I an amused by the notion > of what would happen if Obama were retrospectively disqualified. So > come on... tell me what you think would happen. Let's start with a few facts. > > every bill Obama signed would be rendered immediately void. this also > means all spending and appropriation bills. That means all that money > paid to federal employees would immediately become repayable in full. > The government itself would be effectively unconstitutional and cease > to exist. All your welfare payments would have been illegal and > subject to immediate repayment except of course there would be no federal employees left to take the money. > They were just all dismissed because there is no money - and has been > none for 3 years - to pay them. Every judicial appointment made would > be unconstitutional thus rendering every judgment they make - civil or > criminal > - invalid and subject to immediate dismissal. All tax payments would > be invalidated as the government mandated with its collection was not > in existence for over 3 years. > > how's that scenario sound to you? worth all the ridiculous postering > over a 'natural born' distinction that is as idiotic as it is > discriminatory? The reason why there is no judge alive that would rule > against the certificate is that the chaos that would ensue could possibly destroy the nation. > > It is an idiotic pseudo argument made in response to losing an > election. it is like the 2000 stolen election all over again. You > republicans really ought to learn to lose with grace since you can't govern with competence. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Pete Theisen > Sent: Thursday, 5 January 2012 6:17 PM > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: Re: [OT] Georgia Court takes case of Obama citizenship > > Nicholas Geti wrote: >> http://visiontoamerica.org/6906/breaking-georgia-court-to-hear-natura >> l >> -born-citizen-case-vs-obama/ >> >> >> I doubt that it will do any good but at least some people are still >> trying to make Obama's birth certificate null and void. > >> This case, in Georgia, deals specifically with the Natural Born >> Citizen issue. >> >> In a previous article, we brought up the Minor vs Happersett case >> from >> 1875 in which the Supreme Court defined a NBC as one who has 2 >> parents which were citizens at the time of the subject's birth. We >> also cited >> 3 other cases in which the Supreme Court, previous to the Minor case, >> said the same thing. >> >> Since Obama's father, at the time of Barack's birth, was not a U.S. >> citizen, nor did he ever become one, according to the U.S. Supreme >> Court in 1875.Obama is NOT a Natural Born Citizen. >> >> If not a NBC.then, according to the Constitution, Obama is ineligible >> to serve as President. > > Not only his father was not a citizen, his mother was too young to > confer citizenship by birth to a child born outside of the states. > > Should cast some light on the subject. Never mind that he has proven > most inept and the whole business community feels they can't trust him. > I mean, except those on the take. > -- > Regards, > > Pete > http://pete-theisen.com/ > http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
