Nicholas Geti wrote: > Aren't you one of those who have railed against the government dictating the > rules? Now, you want to implement a whole new set of rules to get around the > current rules.
Hi Nicholas, I don't recall broadly campaigning against "rules", but have objected to certain rules that are unwise or unconstitutional. This however, would pass muster on all fronts. Also, the cars/trucks would get better fuel mileage if they couldn't speed in slow zones. >> If the cars *couldn't* be operated unsafely . . . >> >> What would it take? They all have computers already, just write some new >> software. Have GPS tell the car where it is, have the clock tell it what >> time, have sensors tell it the traffic and weather conditions and the >> car would be limited to a safe speed, even with the pedal to the metal. >> >> No more idiots speeding in neighborhoods or parking lots! Retrofit older >> cars as a condition of issuing tags. >> >> Why? Economy standards are causing fatalities. >> >> http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/296998/cafe-standards-kill-deroy-murdock >> >> Tamper with it and serve a lengthy prison term. Help someone tamper with >> it and lose your mechanic's license plus serve jail time. That and lose >> your driver's license forever. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
