On 06/22/2012 02:00 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
> On Jun 22, 2012, at 1:47 PM, Leland Jackson wrote:
>
>> Removing the old stuff would make the app cleaner, faster, and easier to
>> learn and use, but at the price of breaking legacy code that might
>> require a lot of work to update.
>       Then you run the legacy code on the legacy version. New code runs on 
> the new, cleaner version.
>
> -- Ed Leafe

Eventually the old system will be locked out from the rest of the world.

In each new release of an OS, including its core apps, there are usually 
additions to the class libraries, which include new properties and 
methods.  As developers begin targeting the new functionality, they 
create dependencies on the latest version of the class libraries being 
present.  Therefore, in a stagnant environment you will run into 
situations like firing up your browser to check your bank account, only 
to be greeted with a message that your browser is no longer supported, 
and should be updated.

You may find that in order to update your browser, you must first 
upgrade your OS to meet the browser's dependencies, but doing so will 
create problems running VFP, so you can become stuck.  People think they 
don't have to upgrade or stay current, but its a necessity; unless you 
want to become isolated, venerable to security risks, or broken down, ( 
eg the maintenance of older system or incompatibility of older drivers 
with current hardware and OS dilemma ).


Regards,

LelandJ


>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to