Yeah, I agree: simple auto-complete is enough. Now that I have completely hijacked this thread: My apologies.
Ken On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Ed Leafe <[email protected]> wrote: > On Feb 4, 2013, at 5:18 PM, Paul McNett <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Well unless I'm missing something the built-in one has no idea what > namespace context > > we are in when suggesting completions, and it doesn't complete method > arguments, etc. > > Ah, I see what you mean. No, I don't miss any of that, but I can > see how others might. I just want it to autocomplete what I'm typing; I > don't need it to understand my code for me. > > > -- Ed Leafe > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFyV=lnpwntsncxjg8fbreubstkdyz1mjwkrmbtto5lozpp...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
