Ed Leafe <> wrote: > On Oct 27, 2006, at 12:40 PM, Stephen the Cook wrote: > >>> It's an excellent database server, no doubt. But the 'junk' is all >>> the licensing and legal BS that comes with it. Why would you want to >>> have to subject yourself and your clients to that, when there are >>> other quality products out there that work as well? >> >> Because it's easy to agree to use if for a client that wants it. > > Well, duh - if the client wants it, then that's what they want. But > it begs the question: why ask when it's already been decided? > > Since opinions were being asked, it stands to reason that the client > had *not* requested a particular database.
I thought the Q was oriented along the line of "Any problems with 2005 Express your having?" and not "Would you run with 2005 Express or another -free- versioned db?" Stephen Russell DBA / .Net Developer Memphis TN 38115 901.246-0159 "Our scientific power has outrun our spiritual power. We have guided missiles and misguided men." Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/ -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.408 / Virus Database: 268.13.11/496 - Release Date: 10/24/2006 _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
