You need it by line item so that you can more easily reverse that part of the transaction. IAC this is why having a service you can call that keeps track of each state's regs so you don't have to build and maintain them all in code is worthwhile.
-- rk -----Original Message----- From: ProfoxTech <profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com> On Behalf Of Stephen Russell Sent: Friday, June 22, 2018 11:58 AM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: Fun with US sales tax Functional Government? hahahahaha Just a heads up on the stupidity of taxes. My county has a State rate + a VARIABLE county rate that is a function of the $$$ amount of the sale. If the sale price is over 6500 the rate is no longer charged to that 6500. value. 7.00 sate + 2.5 county for under 6500, otherwise it is 7.0 * price + 162.50 Of course, that is by line item and not the total on the bill total, just for giggles. On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 10:53 AM Richard Kaye <rk...@invaluable.com> wrote: > Yes. Many states have different tax rates and keeping on top of that stuff > is a bear. This is what makes it attractive and worth the cost to use a > service that takes care of all the fine details. > > If we had a functional government I would expect Congress to figure out > how to fix the upcoming mess. > > -- > > rk > > -----Original Message----- > From: ProfoxTech <profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com> On Behalf Of Stephen > Russell > Sent: Friday, June 22, 2018 11:47 AM > To: profoxt...@leafe.com > Subject: Re: Fun with US sales tax > > Taxes get DEEP as I remember. State, County, City/Parish, etc. > > Now do you pay a trifle to check them for every transaction or do you build > a log to keep all these value pairs with a date? Yeah a .001 cent fee per > sale I'd get the rate for each sale. Now if it was 1.00 USD I'd think > twice about the log. > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 5:36 PM Mike <m...@ggisoft.com> wrote: > > > Interesting... > > > > I just got an email from one of the companies I had spoken with a year > > or so ago. > > > > FWIW, TaxCloud.com <https://taxcloud.com/> is the company's website. > > > > As you can imagine, they are swamped with contacts looking for solutions > > today. Their website is pretty sluggish. > > > > Mike Copeland > > > > Richard Kaye wrote: > > > Thanks, Mike. That was my assumption, as well. As you say, trying to > > keep up with tax regulations in 50 states (well, 45) is what makes a > > service like this worth paying for. And I have no problems paying for > > something where value is received. After all, I charge my clients for my > > services. Having said that, nobody wants to be gouged... > > > > > > -- > > > > > > rk > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: ProfoxTech <profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com> On Behalf Of Mike > > > Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2018 3:46 PM > > > To: profoxt...@leafe.com > > > Subject: Re: Fun with US sales tax > > > > > > There are several, and the common scheme is to charge you a rate for > > > each access via the API. Usually something in the tenths of a cent > range. > > > > > > So if you need a rate for a quote, you pay. > > > If you need a rate for a sale, you pay. > > > If you just need to check a rate for confirmation, you pay. > > > > > > Or, you can wade into the swamp of 50 different tax schemes full of > > > incredible complexity. For fun, read up on California's sales tax. Oye. > > > > > > Sorry, but I don't have any recommendation for which company to use for > > > tax compliance as I've avoided the problem so far. > > > > > > Mike C > > > > > > > > > > > > Richard Kaye wrote: > > >> Our wondrous Supreme Court has opened the Pandora’s Sales Tax box with > > today’s decision to allow states to require retailers with no physical > > presence in a particular state to collect sales tax for that state. > Leaving > > aside any thoughts on the wisdom of this decision, which I have not > looked > > at, I’d like to call on the collective wisdom of those who deal with > > invoicing to find out if any of you are using some sort of service > > provider/API to retrieve tax rates, presumably by submitting the address > of > > the buyer to some kind of web API. > > >> > > >> For our non-US ProFox friends, you can just sit back and laugh. 😊 > > >> > > >> TIA > > >> > > >> -- > > >> > > >> rk > > >> [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cajidmyk5gfgyaoyk1r_pdtk1ct7smpy5uhqeuouqo4ik6yp...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. Report [OT] Abuse: http://leafe.com/reportAbuse/cajidmyk5gfgyaoyk1r_pdtk1ct7smpy5uhqeuouqo4ik6yp...@mail.gmail.com _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cy4pr10mb12398622f16ab0d8175caeccd2...@cy4pr10mb1239.namprd10.prod.outlook.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
