Did you ever think that perhaps by doing this, they are cutting down on their support issues, or are in fact saying that we will not support it under these scenarios...
If that is the case, I have no problems with that. Virgil Bierschwale http://www.tccutlery.com http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen the Cook Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 9:29 PM To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: RE: [NF] -- Hell yes to virtualization! MB Software Solutions <> wrote: > Bill Anderson wrote: >> "I don't want to keep beating up on Microsoft; I really don't, but it >> is particularly hard to avoid doing so at the moment. The company's >> ubiquity means that one can't help but notice the sometimes >> unpleasant, occasionally weird and often downright sleazy things that >> it does. >> >> The thing that caught my eye this week was the following line in the >> End User License Agreement (EULA) for Microsoft's Vista Home Basic >> and Vista Home Premium: "USE WITH VIRTUALIZATION TECHNOLOGIES. You >> may not use the software installed on the licensed device within a >> virtual (or otherwise emulated) hardware system." (See page 11 of the >> EULA.)" >> >> "The real weirdness clincher is making the prohibition legally >> binding through the EULA. Microsoft didn't just provide advice to >> consumers; the company made it so that it could take consumers to >> court should they be caught running Basic or Premium in a virtual >> machine. That's the way to build a loyal consumer base! >> >> If Microsoft keeps this clause in the final Vista EULA, I think every >> right-minded consumer should consider this as an issue of unfair >> trade practice by the corporate equivalent of a schoolyard bully. >> >> Consumers should get themselves a virtualization system, such as Mare >> or Parallels, and run it with Vista Basic or Vista Premium on >> principle. If Microsoft decides to take legal action, I think we'll >> all ante up for the consumer's defense. >> >> Letting Microsoft get away with this nonsense will set a precedent >> that will come back to bite us in the digital assets, allowing, as it >> will, software vendors and ultimately hardware vendors to dictate >> how, when and where we can use their products. The first hurdle will >> be the consumer market, and the professional market will be next. How >> hard do you want your job and your life to be?" >> >> <http://www.networkworld.com/columnists/2006/120406backspin.html> >> > > Bill -- most end users probably don't understand virtualization let > alone care about it. That's what M$ banks on and allows them to stay > on top for many many years to come. The "geek" kingdom is not the > dominant type of person out there, I'd bet. It's Joe "What's a Disk > Drive?" Home User. Michael, they are going after Ed, and Whil, and possibility Charlie. They are keeping their OS as the Base OS and not an optional one for occasional use. Stephen Russell DBA / .Net Developer Memphis TN 38115 901.246-0159 "Our scientific power has outrun our spiritual power. We have guided missiles and misguided men." Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/ -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.6/567 - Release Date: 12/4/2006 [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
