> > Of course, because the central component of any real, workable plan > > would start with making him and his gang culpable. > > I disagree. I can't believe that our troops who are > there would rather wait and continue to be stuck in the middle of a civil war > while we figure out how to blame the right people. I know that given > a choice between getting them home and safe soon, or getting Bush & > Co. behind bars, I'll take the former. There is no need to get more > of our troops killed while we sort out the crimes of our leaders.
I imagine several steps necessarily happening concurrently. The thing is that the invasion resulted in civil war, so we're now obliged to stop the fighting. The only way I can see to do that is to engage with the UN for serious multi-national participation. Since that option was completely abused and thus dried up by the protagonist's deceit, I think the only way we're going to get that kind of support is to concurrently begin proceedings against those responsible for the invasion. In other words, to now gain their trust and cooperation, we have to do something really substantial to show that we've come around. I don't see talk alone getting that job done. Bill > -- Ed Leafe _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
