No its not.. Menu's are akin to doors Reports are akin to windows.. There isn't one thing in the programming world that couldn't benefit from fixed objects, and by that I mean you pass a text string to a box with the coordinates and it displays the message with the appropriate buttons..
If we'd spend less time reinventing the wheel and more time benefiting from the combined experience of all our minds, we would be 100 times better off then we are now. Virgil Bierschwale http://www.virgilslist.com http://www.tccutlery.com http://www.bierschwale.com http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chet Gardiner Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 2:26 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [NF] Microsoft Caught out - Naughty, Naughty! The real reason is that programming is an art, not a science... Can't certify art... Dave Crozier wrote: >Hal wrote: > >"...A thorough understanding of algorithmic principles, database, some >math, regression, ETHICS, etc. is what should qualify someone to be a >computer professional" > >TOTALLY WRONG Hal I'm afraid. The thing that qualifies someone to be a >computer professional in its true sense (where software is concerned >anyhow) is the ability to write GOOD software, and the definition of >good will change depending upon the environment you are working in. >Good in an emergency situation is a fix that works and gets the system >live again however it is done. Good in a production environment means >reliable and stable. Good in a performance dictated situation means fast and reliable. > >It's just like driving. All drivers make mistakes, the difference >between a good driver and a bad driver is that the good driver will >always know whenever he/she has made a mistake and the majority of >outsiders/onlookers will never ever notice the mistake. The bad driver >is just a danger to others because he doesn't understand the >ramification(s) of making a mistake >- or even worse, what a "mistake" constitutes. > >Remember you don’t have to be able to read music to be a great musician. >I'll take natural talent as opposed to paper qualifications any day of >the week. Try and teach dancing to someone who has no sense of rhythm >and you'll see exactly what I mean. > >Having all the paper qualifications only gives you a head start in the >"ability to understand basic methodology" but there is absolutely NO >substitute for experience and natural ability in this business. > >Dave Crozier > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >Behalf Of Hal Kaplan >Sent: 17 January 2007 20:55 >To: ProFox Email List >Subject: RE: [NF] Microsoft Caught out - Naughty, Naughty! > > >=> And the second problem is that all of the folks in the biz => would >want to be grandfathered in. Who in their right mind => would submit to >having to gain credentials (that they may or => may not be qualified to >earn) to do what they've been doing => for the last 10 or 20 years? >=> >=> So, just like the answer about how God created the world in => 6 >days.... >=> He didn't have to worry about the installed base. >=> >=> Whil >=> > >During those 6 days, G-d did not create the AMA, ABA, AIA, AICPA, or >any other professional group except perhaps for clergy. > >The "installed base" existed for all of these professions and it is now >all a matter of history. Some practioners fared better than others but >on the whole society gained. BTW, you do not need a degree in >architecture to be an architect, or a law degree to be an attorney (I >am not sure about medicine and accounting). You can become a licensed >professional through well-documented experience. Of course you still >need to take and pass the state licensing exam. And I dare say that if >a similarly-structured arrangement existed for people like us, a good >number would pass the exam and gain "grandfather" status, others would >fail, and still others would walk away or do nothing because the >effective date for all of the lead-ins to congeal would probably be 6 to 10 years off. > >What is needed to achieve widespread licensing is a catalyst such as a >massive lapse of public safety or security that could be laid at the >feet of the profession as it exists today. > >There are no questions of impartiality or any nonsense like that. >Those arguments are specious. All professions have competing suppliers >who will do almost anything to get and keep business ... ruthlessly and >illegally too! But the basics of these professions: the chemistry of >life, anatomy, legal precedent, torts, etc. are independent of >commercialism. Intel and AMD may be making a lot of bits, but they did >not invent them. A thorough understanding of algorithmic principles, >database, some math, regression, ETHICS, etc. is what should qualify someone to be a computer professional. > >B+ >HALinNY > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
