> > Vista will take a LONG time for mainstream adoption, just as Windows > > XP did, but I think it'll be even longer this time.
> I think you're right, as there is much less of a compelling reason to go > from XP SP2 to Vista than there was from 2k to XP. I was thinking that when I wrote this comment, but it's hard for me to think of any specific reasons XP is better than W2K... Only a few ideas come to mind: o new 'look and feel'/themes o Easy Alternate IP configuration for NIC's(useful for laptops) o ClearType fonts o Better handling of multiple monitors o Able to run IE7(Microsoft's attempt at forcing late adopters from W2K to XP) Quite a lackluster list, honestly... It makes me wonder why I have XP installed at home and want it here at work... -- Derek _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
