> I was thinking that when I wrote this comment, but it's hard for me to > think of any specific reasons XP is better than W2K... Only a few > ideas come to mind: > > o new 'look and feel'/themes > o Easy Alternate IP configuration for NIC's(useful for laptops) > o ClearType fonts > o Better handling of multiple monitors > o Able to run IE7(Microsoft's attempt at forcing late adopters from W2K to > XP) > > Quite a lackluster list, honestly... It makes me wonder why I have XP > installed at home and want it here at work...
Ah-- just remembered the #1 reason to go to WINXP Pro from W2K Pro-- Remote Desktop. Far superior to the alternatives, in practice, I've found. UltraVNC is more likely to crash my host computer and performs poorly over slow links -- Derek _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
