Well, here is a math problem for you. Given that GNP remain the same, but population in the U.S. declines, would that result in more GNP per preson or less. GNP per person? As population declines in relation to a constant amount of goods and services, then goods and services available per person increases, and the demand on the planet can also be reduced with a reduction in population.
Regards, LelandJ MB Software Solutions General Account wrote: > Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > >> Control of overpopulation does not mean no new babies. <g> If there we >> no new babies, humans would go extent within a few generations. Control >> of overpopulation mean a limit on the number of babies to maintain >> current level, or where need a gradual reduction in population. >> >> The U.S. is the most fully developed country in the world, and with >> computers, new scientific discoveries, automation, mass production, etc, >> the U.S. would have little trouble sustaining a no population growth or >> reduction in population, while still caring for an increasingly aged >> population until thing were leveled out again. This would be a problem >> for other countries that are not as fully developed as the U.S., though. >> >> > > Let me first say that the "baby-boomer" generation has many great, good > souls/people. When they all die off from old age (10-20 years?), will > the economy surge as we won't need to pay for them any more? > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
