Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > Well, here is a math problem for you. Given that GNP remain the same, > but population in the U.S. declines, would that result in more GNP per > preson or less. GNP per person? As population declines in relation to a > constant amount of goods and services, then goods and services > available per person increases, and the demand on the planet can also be > reduced with a reduction in population. >
So in layman's or non-math-guru-speak, less people is a good thing, if I understand you correctly. <g> _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
