>I'd say there's a worrying trend there. In the overall scheme of things, you don't have sufficient data. However, assuming it is a real trend, can you plot this honestly in a manner that shows it is significantly beyond the realm of natural fluctuation? Then, can you show there is a cause that can be remediated?
If not, then you can handle my worrying in addition to your own. I simply do not have time for it. Investigate all you want, but if your conclusions require that we all go along for them to succeed, you jolly well better show some really significant deviation from natural variations. Otherwise, would it not be wrong for us puny humans to try to do anything that would interfere with the order of nature? Heck, are we not wrong to try to extinguish forest fires caused by lightning that clear large areas of underbrush, trees, etc. so a new life cycle may begin in that section of land? Larry Miller --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
