The move to NAV 2007 vs staying with NAV2006 was indeed the issue, but with Win2k it is not a viable option. Hence th need to move to different app, or update the signature file subscription. The new retail NAV2006 from buycheapsoftware.com, even with shipping, is less than a renewal from Symantec.
Re: 2006 vs 2007 (much NAV2008 that is now out), NAV2006 is a fine version to stay on. NAV2007 is a little simpler looking, until one needs to get into the inner workings to set certain options that are not as obvious to find. And, NAV2007 is supposedly a bit better at intercepting Spyware than 2006. I have used both in places where SAV Corporate is not used, and both do a fine job. http://www.symantec.com/norton/blog/detail.jsp?blogid=nis2007beta&profileid= laura_garcia-manrique http://reviews.cnet.com/internet-security-and-firewall/norton-antivirus-2007 /4505-3667_7-32069537.html?tag=b_readfull (there are references to 2006 and prior versions vs 2007) Gil > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ed Leafe > Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 12:31 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [NF] Recommendations for Norton AntiVirus removal? > > > On Sep 3, 2007, at 12:17 PM, mrgmhale wrote: > > > Bill is correct. You can still get NAV 2006 at > > www.buycheapsoftware.com, > > But is the level of protection in 2006 the same as 2007? Isn't the > issue that he already has 2006, and needs to upgrade to 2007 to > remain fully protected? > > -- Ed Leafe > -- http://leafe.com > -- http://dabodev.com > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
