On 10/13/07, Dave Crozier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Malcolm, > Acronis is slimmer in disk storage and I like the interface. Norton Ghost > needs the .NET framework loaded to run - talk about bloatware. The disk > imaging used in Norton uses the Windows Shadow copy procedure and is quite > slick as you can image a "live" running disk but only to a local hard disk > or DVD or (if you are brave) another IP device.
Last version of Ghost I checked they still provided the command line version. Fits on a floppy (or even better a bootable USB stick). Works great. -- Paul _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
