I'm not going to make a big speech, but I disagree with rules to rid a
member of the list for posting OT. They may also post relevant useful stuff.
But its your list so I wont argue. Just one point, too many people posted OT
remarks not thinking that this is not a USA only membership.
Allen

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ed Leafe

        Because this is a community list that grew out of the desire of the
community to share both technical knowledge and other life experiences. The
tech list was set up to satisfy those people who had content restrictions on
their email set by their employer. The [OT] label has always been a
voluntary thing which has worked remarkably well, with a few noticeable
exceptions.

        To echo your point, I have never understood why people can't take
responsibility for filtering their email, and instead expect someone else to
do it for them. It really isn't hard to set up a rule in any modern email
client that will redirect mail from particular addresses to the trash if
those authors have demonstrated their unwillingness to act as part of this
community. It's simple to do, and it makes the overall experience of being a
part of this list so much more pleasant.

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.15.1/1079 - Release Date: 19/10/2007
05:10
 



_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to