Stephen, > Bill these changes are for creating a more secure > environment. In the past it was easy for you to make the > modifications you needed. Guess what, so could a hacker. > Would you believe that they did? Do we blame the hackers for > attacking us? Do we blame M$ for not protecting us? > > So as time moves on and we realize that we realize that > change for a more secure workspace is good, why do you throw > a hissy fit? > > They have released these rules to us over a year ago, and > your now seeing that they get in your way? You were given > ample time to adapt to the new rules, have you even > considered toying with them? Others on this list were > playing in 06 and 07.
I don't care how many lockdowns MS puts into the OS, so long as Admin has the ability to allow exceptions for cases such as this, where an installed application needs to maintain itself. Why dance around this basic question? Sure, we all care about security, but if can't do our job, then we've got nothing. What's the answer? Bill > Stephen Russell _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
