> Depends on what you want to do with Linux. Personally, I can't see how
anyone could use Linux as a serious development machine without being at
home with the command line

I set up a Dell SC420 with 2Gb RAM to run a Linux Server OS.  After a lot of
looking around I opted to go with Novell Suse Linux Enterprise Server v-10.
I subscribed to their annual update service ($300/yr), and their 5 x 12 Tech
Support ($400/yr).  I am still a Linux newbie "on the move", and wanted to
use a Linux OS that was supported by Symantec's Cross-Platform pcAnywhere
v-12.1 (Windows, Mac OS X, and Red Hat or Suse Linux) for remote desktop
control.  I ended up opting for Suse vs Red Hat for several reasons (annual
fee being one of them, a nice graphical interface being another), and could
not be happier.  I do not do any actual "development" on the Server, per se.
It is being used primarily as a File Server for a few VFP Projects that are
running on Windows workstations. I still do my serious development in the
Windows environment, and likely will for a long time yet.

My objective with Linux was to learn to set up and use a File Server
environment for clients that would let them escape the Windows Server OS,
User CAL and new Terminal Service CAL fees from Microsoft (after having been
burned with the new 2003 Server Terminal Server CAL additional fee).  As a
File Server Suse Linux does a great job, and the graphical interface let me
get up to a functional level quickly.  I have purchased several books on
Suse Linux, and have used the Terminal interface quite a few times - but
work within the graphical interface as much as I can.

For the most part I have had little need to do much more than install
pcAnywhere, set up some users and permissions, and configure the Ethernet
card with a static IP Address.  Could I have done that with Ubuntu Linux
Server?  Sure, I installed it on another server, and have several books on
that also.  But I could not have had pcAnywhere, nor as sweet a rapid File
Server setup with it as Suse Linux (which is extremely robust, & comes with
lots of goodies).  So for me the $700 I invested in the Suse Linux OS has
been worth every penny, as will be subsequent years with the
maintenance/update fee only.

As for workstation Linux, my target market is not going to be anywhere near
Linux in the foreseeable future.  But for my father and father-in-law I went
to Linspire Linux several years ago, and have not had a single problem since
then.  Linspire is now using Ubuntu as their desktop core, but I have not
yet tried to use it.  One of the attractions of Linspire was its graphical
interface, and its CNR (Click-n-Run) app that provides for OS & application
updates, and makes installing new apps a snap for End Users.

IMHO, graphical interfaces may be for wimps in the mind of some folks, but I
tend to view CLI vs graphical interface much as I do with DOS vs Windows -
the graphical interface lets more folks become productive for their needs
faster than with CLI.  I can get things done in a Command Shell (DOS), but I
try to stay in the Graphical Interface as much as I can to get routine
things done quickly and easily.  Why suffer needlessly?  Just because I am
real good with DOS does not mean I have to use it when an easier tool is
available.  Ditto for Linux CLI and graphic interfaces.


Gil

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Paul McNett
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 10:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [NF] Linux fans and command line familiarity (was Re: [NF]
Versioncontrol of source code options)


MB Software Solutions wrote:

> Paul McNett wrote:
>> Nothing beats learning the subversion command line interface, though.
>>
>
> If you're not a command line fan, can you survive in a Linux world?

Depends on what you want to do with Linux. Personally, I can't see how
anyone could use Linux as a serious development machine without being at
home with the command line, but I'm sure it's been done.

Paul

--
http://paulmcnett.com


[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to