On Jan 29, 2008, at 9:10 AM, Stephen Russell wrote:
>> From both sides of the SOA house. I have had to deal with a lot of
>> java /
> IBM / SAP and it is not much different.
>
> SOAP is anything but simple past it's deffinition.
Exactly my point. SOAP has been bastardized by all of these companies
so badly that the 'S' now stands for 'Sucks'.
People have been convinced that this is the only way to do SOA, and
that's just flat-out wrong. If you're in a SOAP-based service, you're
stuck, but until you're locked into that path, you owe it to your
business to check out better ways of achieving the same thing.
-- Ed
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
