That's why people own guns, to shoot the bad guy threatening them. If someone was armed in this meeting, far less damage would have occured.
--- David Crooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday, February 08, 2008 11:07 AM Jean Laeremans > wrote: > > >Which doesn't make it less pertinent, i'd say > > Personally, I see no reason for anyone to have a > handgun except to shoot > someone. I own a .22 rifle to kill the groundhogs > on my property and I > do not need an assault rifle to get the job done. I > don't think the > 'shooter' would have gotten as far if he walked in > with a rifle vs. a > handgun... > > David L. Crooks > > > > _______________________________________________ > Post Messages to: [email protected] > Subscription Maintenance: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > Searchable Archive: > http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, > are the opinions of the author, and do not > constitute legal or medical advice. This statement > is added to the messages for those lawyers who are > too stupid to see the obvious. > _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
