We created the concept of 'restraint' in this since through the MAD doctrine, which was not 'official' U.S, policy. The official intent of SIOP V was 'assured destruction'.
Oh, SIOP is Single Integrated Operation Plan, when I was cleared at TS/SCI at the time it was plan number 5, it is now Plan #62. The intent is still assured destruction of the enemy. v/r //SIGNED// Stephen S. Wolfe, YA2, DAF 6th MDG Data Services Manager 6th MDG Information System Security Officer Comm (813) 827-9994 DSN 651-9994 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jean Laeremans Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 8:13 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] 3,000 centrifuges in Iran? On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 2:00 PM, Wolfe, Stephen S Civ USAF AMC 6 MDSS/SGSI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You have a point, but let me ask you this question -- do you think we > have shown restraint in using the nuclear weapon since we used it one > time and have studied over and over again the devastating results? > Would other emerging societies exercise the same restraint? Restraint ? Probably due to the fact the other side may retaliate in kind . A+ jml [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
