On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Alan Bourke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Charlie Coleman wrote: > > > > As for there "cost of change", yep, every time MS releases a patch, > there > > are hundreds of man-hours at each MS-using site that get spent trying to > > mitigate the damage. > So you're saying EVERY time MS release a patch then EVERY MS-using site > has to spend hours mitigating the damage, because every patch causes > problems? Patently untrue. The vast majority of MS patches cause > absolutely no problems to the vast majority of the millions of computers > they roll out onto. And in my admittedly relatively brief experience in > the Linux world I've had plenty of updates and patches screwing things > up too. It's the law of averages. > ------------------------------------------------------------ Alan because you didn't pay for that abuse, it is not really any problem. But if Big Brother forced an update then hell be on your house. -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer Mimeo.com Memphis TN 901.246-0159 --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
