Charlie Coleman wrote:
> Really? You missed the whole auto-update thing - MS making changes even if 
> you have allow auto-updates turned off?
>   
You mean where Windows Update was updating itself and not anything else, 
because:

"any user who chooses to use Windows Update either expected updates to 
be installed or to at least be notified that updates were available.  
Had we failed to update the service automatically, users would not have 
been able to successfully check for updates and, in turn, users would 
not have had updates installed automatically or received expected 
notifications.  "

OK, they should have done it a better way but it wasn't applying 
security patches and the like without consent.




_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to