Gil Hale wrote: >> This has nothing to do with what people see. You're not answering the >> question as it's written!! Read it EXACTLY without any inferences! >> >> > > I was not trying to answer a question at all. I was merely expressing an > opinion from my perspective, based on my observations and needs. For that > matter I did state that I do not mind working with IDE, so I guess one could > surmise that was an answer embedded within my expounding a bit. Nothing > unusual there, eh? But, I guess I do not count as "most people", nor would > I presume to answer what "most people" may want as my own prejudices would > likely creep in and I would have no supportive data at hand to defend my gut > feel. Hmmm, perhaps I ought not have answered the call for what we thought > at all and saved a lot of agony <g>... > >
What nonsense talk is that, my friend...you count just as much as anyone! I just saw you reading into my question beyond what I was asking...that's all. No harm, no foul. Sorry if I seemed like a dooschbag in my hasty response....sometimes I'm a turd. <g> _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
