On Apr 1, 2008, at 9:08 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
> I thought that there were a few versions of the Gospels we know of
> today as
> well as other Gospels that were discounted and not considered part
> of the
> official set of texts. So the leaders of the church took it upon
> themselves
> to set the story straight.
OK, let's see if I understand this right. There's a revolution
against the Tsar in Russia, and the events of that revolution are
recorded. A few years later, as the result of internal political
infighting, some of the records are changed to eliminate the
participation of some of the leading figures, as they would represent
unpleasant political realities for the current leadership.
Is this what you call "setting the story straight"?
-- Ed Leafe
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
