On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Apr 1, 2008, at 9:08 PM, Stephen Russell wrote: > > > I thought that there were a few versions of the Gospels we know of > > today as > > well as other Gospels that were discounted and not considered part > > of the > > official set of texts. So the leaders of the church took it upon > > themselves > > to set the story straight. > > > OK, let's see if I understand this right. There's a revolution > against the Tsar in Russia, and the events of that revolution are > recorded. A few years later, as the result of internal political > infighting, some of the records are changed to eliminate the > participation of some of the leading figures, as they would represent > unpleasant political realities for the current leadership. > > Is this what you call "setting the story straight"? > -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
When you have slight variations of the same story, or the order is different between one group and another these are what was set straight. The catechism defines most of this as being the only rule book out there . -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer Mimeo.com Memphis TN 901.246-0159 --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
