On Sunday 20 April 2008 11:27, Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh wrote: > > http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=luke%2014:26;&version=65; > > http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=luke%2014:26;&version=51; > > http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=luke%2014:26;&version=46; > > http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=luke%2014:26;&version=78; > > http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=luke%2014:26;&version=74; > > > > Of course, none of the left wing news outlets slant the news to > > their agenda, always being the models of objectivity. > > Of course, no bible publisher would slant translations to pander to > Christians with simplistic beliefs to reflect what they *wish* the > bible said, rather than what scholars say that the words *actually* say. > > The "New Life" version; the "Contemporary English" version, what > pabulum.
Hi Ken! There are whole churches who maintain that the KJV is the only "correct" translation. The original languages were things like Greek, Hebrew and Aramaic, why not just learn those languages and have no translation at all? -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
