>> Of course, no bible publisher would slant translations to pander to
>> Christians with simplistic beliefs to reflect what they *wish* the
>> bible said, rather than what scholars say that the words *actually* say.
>Hi Ken!
>There are whole churches who maintain that the KJV is the only "correct"
>translation. The original languages were things like Greek, Hebrew and
>Aramaic, why not just learn those languages and have no translation at all?
Hey isn't the KJV what Paul carried? ;-) In any case, the book was written to
be read not be filtered by 'scholars'. I would suggest that most of those
whining about what is supposedly in the book have not taken the trouble to read
it themselves.
I also find it interesting that the 'intellectual' mind can never accept simple
answers like John 3:16.
--
Larry Miller
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/mixed
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
message/rfc822
---
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
