Wolfe, Stephen S Civ USAF AMC 6 MDSS/SGSI wrote: > Some reliance, only for the heavy diesel transportation, trains and > aircraft. You don't think stopping all small vehicle use of petroleum > wouldn't drastically improve the situation? > > Also, I forgot to put up the point that the US after achieving a minimum > of 50% hydrogen fuel cell utilization in ordinary automobile utilization > would compete internationally with OPEC but mark down the bbl price 10%. > Not to mention the US should share it's improved hydrogen fuel cell > technology with the world. >
Errrhh... small point... hydrogen fuel cell is NOT an energy source, it's just energy storage, so the question will still be: WHERE does all the energy for all those hydrogen cells come from? > v/r > > > //SIGNED// > > Stephen S. Wolfe, YA2, DAF > 6th MDG Data Services Manager > 6th MDG Information System Security Officer > Comm (813) 827-9994 DSN 651-9994 > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Ed Leafe > Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 10:51 AM > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: Re: [OT] Opinions? > > On May 2, 2008, at 9:44 AM, Wolfe, Stephen S Civ USAF AMC 6 MDSS/SGSI > wrote: > >> Actually, yes it did. The very short executive summary would be the >> following: > > > Sure sounds like a continued reliance on the same raw material, > even > if the source is changed. > > -- Ed Leafe > > _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
