So now the lawyer is telling them that an EMAIL to me telling me to continue work was a legal obligation to continue the previous contract.
When I said, "I'll wait for the contract", it was equivalent to me refusing to work. I've never heard that an EMAIL that says, "continue to work" would bind anyone to a previous contract that had expired. Since when are EMAILS with no signature binding? --- On Tue, 5/6/08, MB Software Solutions General Account <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: MB Software Solutions General Account <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [NF] Contract not renewed. > To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> > Date: Tuesday, May 6, 2008, 5:06 PM > Michael Madigan wrote: > > Wow it's crazy out there. > > > > So I've been working on a 3-month contract and it > ended April 25th. So they asked me if I would work on a > monthly contract and I agreed. So yesterday when I got > back from The Derby, there was no contract waiting for me. > > > > So I sent them an email asking what the story was and > they sent me a letter saying to continue working and > billing and that a contract would be Fedexed today. > > > > So I sent back an email that I would wait for the > contract to do any more work, which seems reasonable to me. > Who works without a contract? > > > > So now they just sent me an email saying that they > changed their mind, implying that I was being difficult, > and they said there won't be a contract coming after > all. > > > > Who do they expect to find to work without a contract? > > > Just smile/laugh and move on. > > > _______________________________________________ > Post Messages to: [email protected] > Subscription Maintenance: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are > the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or > medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for > those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
