On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Michael Madigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So now the lawyer is telling them that an EMAIL to me telling me to > continue work was a legal obligation to continue the previous contract. > > When I said, "I'll wait for the contract", it was equivalent to me > refusing to work. > > I've never heard that an EMAIL that says, "continue to work" would bind > anyone to a previous contract that had expired. > > Since when are EMAILS with no signature binding? > > ------------------------------- You have the prepaid legal so use it. I bet that they won't cover this and then give you a bill because it's for professional work and not personal. -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer Mimeo.com Memphis TN 901.246-0159 --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
