On Jun 9, 2008, at 3:59 PM, Kristyne McDaniel wrote:
> That argument has been used on both sides, as if the fact that Obama
> was
> seen as the first 'viable' African-American candidate for president
> meant
> that he should win so that we could become a post-racial society.
> The fact
> that he is not qualified for the job apparently does not enter into
> the
> equation.
Stating that it is a "fact" that he is unqualified does not magically
change it from your opinion.
Being a good President has nothing to do with the length of your
resume. Cheney, Rumsfeld and all those guys had more experience and
qualifications for holding office than Clinton could ever have, and we
have seen how important those factors were in their job performance.
-- Ed Leafe
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
