Ed, > Being a good President has nothing to do with the > length of your resume. Cheney, Rumsfeld and all those > guys had more experience and qualifications for > holding office than Clinton could ever have, and we > have seen how important those factors were in their > job performance.
Do you not read your own posts? Cheney, Rumsfeld, and all those guys were not the president. George W. Bush was the president. At the time he was first elected, I felt he was unqualified. The Texas governorship is a constitutionally weak position, and I did not feel it qualified him for the presidency. His campaign argued that he'd fill in his resume by putting experienced people around him. Sound familiar? Kristyne _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
