> > Really? I don't think so. Those folks were very passionate about > > Hillary. To have a mutiny against Obama wouldn't be hard to imagine, > > given the way it went down in the end with such a close race and the > > controversy with Florida/Michigan, popular vote vs. delegate vote, > > media > > bias, race card playing, etc. I think those folks would have done > > this > > without any kind of official doctrine from the HQ of Hillary's camp. > > > I think that that explanation is very insulting. It smacks of a > sense > of entitlement, as if Clinton were somehow "owed" victory, and that > Obama's biggest affront was winning.
Wow, Ed is uncharacteristically slow on the uptake on this one... > > And there was no controversy over FL/MI until Clinton herself > raised > it, reversing her previously stated position on how to deal with those > delegates. When she was the front-runner, she said that the rules set > up ahead of time had to be followed; when she was trailing, she > changed her statements because that was her only chance to catch up to > Obama. You can't be bitter about a controversy that your own candidate > created. This made me chuckle... Remember ye not the Florida recount effort, and all the rancor of the Dems who were burned by Gore's scorched earth litigation strategy to keep the recounts going until enough chads fell out of the ballots to give him a 1 vote victory? Jeez, some people have short/selective memories... - Bob > > -- Ed Leafe > > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
