On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Ted Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Paul Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > I wouldn't bother. I installed FF 3 today and IMHO it's not ready for > > release. I'm going back to 2. > > Pray tell why. > > I've been running betas for weeks now and it seems to be more stable > and faster. What problems did you find? > ----------------------------------- I installed it on 4 PCs last night and find it slower to start, and the autocomplete of the URL to be in the way. Is it faster? Not sure. Slower? I don't think so. Lack of older add-ins is my big issue. I realize that it is not Mozilla but it is functionality that I had and is now missing. -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer Mimeo.com Memphis TN 901.246-0159 --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
