Paul Hill wrote: > On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 1:56 AM, Ted Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Paul Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> I wouldn't bother. I installed FF 3 today and IMHO it's not ready for >>> release. I'm going back to 2. >>> >> Pray tell why. >> >> I've been running betas for weeks now and it seems to be more stable >> and faster. What problems did you find? >> > > It's noticeably slower on some sites, (GMail, Slashdot) and it crashed > about 15 minutes after I installed it. FF2 rarely crashes for me. > And what's with the new toolbar icons? They look really bad. > > I'm a huge FF2 fan BTW > > Below are a couple of lins to reviews of firefox3 that were in my inbox this morning:
http://etech.eweek.com/content/web_technology/firefox_30_the_next_generation_web_browser.html or http://tinyurl.com/5ltrus http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Security/First-Impressions-of-Firefox-3/?kc=EWKNLSTE061908FEA1 or http://tinyurl.com/62m338 Regards, LelandJ --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
