The below article about firefox 3 appeared in washingtonpost.com today:

#------------------------------------
Building a Better Browser: Firefox Keeps Innovating
By Rob Pegoraro
Thursday, June 19, 2008; Page D01

Mozilla Firefox, the little Web browser with the quirky name, has grown 
up fast. Four years ago, Firefox was an obscure project Microsoft felt 
free to ignore. Now it has grabbed about a fifth of the market worldwide.

And while Microsoft has shipped only one upgrade to its Internet 
Explorer in that time, Firefox just hit its fourth major release.

Like the earlier 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 versions, Firefox 3 -- a free download 
for Windows 2000, XP and Vista; Mac OS X 10.4 and 10.5; and recent Linux 
releases at http://mozilla.com-- makes the Web easier and safer to use 
in a few distinct ways.

Its tabbed browsing lets you switch among multiple sites in one window, 
and a small box at the top right of every window lets you direct a query 
to your choice of Web search engines. "Find as you type" text searching 
jumps to a given word on a page in moments. Its separation from the guts 
of Windows makes it safer and more reliable than Internet Explorer. And 
Firefox's open-source code allows inspection by anybody, making for fast 
bug fixes.

But Firefox 3 also brings overdue changes to parts of the browsing 
experience that have barely budged in this decade: the bookmarks menu 
and the history list.

This time, Firefox developers -- employees of the Mountain View, Calif., 
nonprofit Mozilla, plus outside volunteers -- stopped pretending that we 
all bookmark our favorite pages with the care of reference librarians.

Instead, they built a better history function: You don't have to 
remember a site's address; you have to recall only its title -- or just 
a word or two of it. As you start typing, Firefox will present a list of 
all the sites that match, then narrow that list as you continue.

If, however, you're a bookmark-tending type, Firefox 3 can help you make 
more sense of your Web favorites. You can tag them for easier reference, 
then sort through to see which ones you visit most and which ones 
collect dust.

Firefox 3 also brings a performance upgrade. Older releases could hog 
memory over time, eventually forcing a browser restart. Firefox 3 needs 
a little less memory and doesn't keep nibbling away at your computer's 
resources over the day.

Most Web users, understandably, worry more about a computer getting 
hijacked than a browser getting slow. The Web is the most useful part of 
a computer, but it's also the most dangerous part, with sites that try 
to force-feed viruses to visiting PCs and those that prey on human 
gullibility.

Here, Firefox 3 yields mixed results.

In its favor, it comes preset to block access to hostile sites on a 
constantly updated blacklist. (A few hours after a phishing e-mail's 
arrival, Firefox 3 refused to load the phony bank site pushed by that 
message, replacing it with a stern "Reported Web Forgery!" alert.)

But Firefox 3 prunes away one of the best anti-phishing features of 
earlier versions. Where they painted the address box gold at a site that 
protected your login with encryption-- a measure almost always absent at 
scam sites -- Firefox 3 adds a less obvious blue highlight to the left 
end of that box, which offers some useful details on the site if you 
think to click on it. Sites offering an extra layer of authentication 
get a larger, green highlight, but amazingly few (for example, Buy.com 
but not Amazon.com) have gone to that trouble yet.

Other visual tweaks to Firefox 3 show a welcome willingness to learn 
from other browsers. Its back button is bigger than its forward button, 
a sensible recognition of which function sees more use (and a smart 
borrowing from Microsoft's long-dead MSN Explorer). You can also resize 
all of a page's contents -- text and images -- with quick keyboard 
shortcuts (a smart borrowing from Opera and Internet Explorer 7).

Although Firefox 3's Mac version looks much more like a standard Mac 
program than Firefox 2 did, it doesn't always work like one. For 
example, it can't display a PDF file hosted on a Web site without, at 
best, some tinkering. The latest version of Safari remains a better pick 
for Mac users.
ad_icon

The wide assortment of free plug-ins available for Firefox 3 
theoretically gives it an infinite feature set, but it's most fairly 
judged as it exists right after being installed.

 From that perspective, whoever's working on Firefox 4 has work left to 
do. Firefox 3 lacks Safari's "private browsing," which lets you borrow 
somebody else's copy without disturbing his or her settings and then 
wipe all traces of your use when you're done, and "forms auto-fill," 
which enters your contact info into Web forms with a single click. Its 
bookmarks and history features lack the visual simplicity of Opera's 
"speed dial" of favorite pages.

Firefox 3's system requirements also exclude many older PCs, while Opera 
touts compatibility as far back as Windows 95.

But when compared with the default browser on any new Windows machine, 
it's no contest. There may be no easier upgrade to your Web experience 
than a switch from Internet Explorer to Firefox. And there may be no 
plainer evidence of the dimwittedness of PC vendors than their failure 
to ship Firefox or any other alternative browser on their machines.

Living with technology, or trying to? E-mail Rob Pegoraro 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Read more at 
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/fasterforward.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/18/AR2008061802731.html?wpisrc=newsletter

or

http://tinyurl.com/6x996e

#-------------------------------------------

Regards,

LelandJ


#------------------------------------------

Regards,

LelandJ


Paul Hill wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 1:56 AM, Ted Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   
>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Paul Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> I wouldn't bother.  I installed FF 3 today and IMHO it's not ready for
>>> release.  I'm going back to 2.
>>>       
>> Pray tell why.
>>
>> I've been running betas for weeks now and it seems to be more stable
>> and faster. What problems did you find?
>>     
>
> It's noticeably slower on some sites, (GMail, Slashdot) and it crashed
> about 15 minutes after I installed it.  FF2 rarely crashes for me.
> And what's with the new toolbar icons?  They look really bad.
>
> I'm a huge FF2 fan BTW
>
>   



--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to