IT's NF because it is business-related and relates to anyone on the list with 
an Aircard and a need to travel outside the country.

************************************************************************
Right Wing Mike
http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike

Vote McCain Not Hussein
http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/4898616

I Wish Hillary had married OJ
http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/4236924


--- On Fri, 9/5/08, Ted Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> From: Ted Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [OT] Family Racks Up $19,370 Cell Phone Bill
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Friday, September 5, 2008, 9:45 AM
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 7:55 AM, David Smith
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Honestly, people like this family drive me nuts. I
> think AT+T deserves to be
> > paid, as the family signed a contract , agreed to
> their terms, and then used
> > the product. Why should AT+T not be paid? Read your
> contracts, people.
> 
> Sure, I've got a contract with my clients that I bill
> $xxx an hour. It
> doesn't mean I can whack them with 10,000 hours of my
> time!
> 
> This has nothing to do with technology and is Not NF,
> it's OT. Just
> because it involves electronics doesn't make it
> technical.
> 
> IMO, it's criminal that cellphone companies are going
> to have to be
> forced by legislation to add a "do-not-exceed"
> amount on their
> accounts to prevent people whose phone is left on, roaming,
> on the
> internet, on their baggage from racking up an amount in
> excess of
> their annual income while the phone is shipped around the
> world. I
> mean, who would WANT that feature? It's a disservice to
> their
> customers that that don't just call them up when they
> exceed 150% of
> their usual bill to say "are you aware of what
> you're doing?"
> 
> 
> -- 
> Ted Roche
> Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
> http://www.tedroche.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Post Messages to: [email protected]
> Subscription Maintenance:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
> OT-free version of this list:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
> Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
> This message:
> http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are
> the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or
> medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for
> those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to