Sometimes I think those sort of changes were done primarily as a response to
the rise of OpenOffice, to differentiate their product from Sun's. A new
look is a good way to help people feel better about tossing down new money
as well. The ribbon concept is good, but I think they dropped the ball by
not making it optional and they certainly didn't make it easy to program for
in Visual Studio. I also think they made an mistake defaulting to the new .x
formats ( docs, xlsx and so on) in Office. I get the xml concept and think
it's a brilliant idea, but they would have done better to not instantly
abandon a format with a decade+ of history and user comfort. 

Thanks,
Dave

David Smith
Systems Administrator
Doan Family of Dealerships
(585) 352-6600 ext.1730
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.upstatedigitools.com


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Weller
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 8:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [NF] M$ to push out Vista replacement in mid 2009

What I can't understand is that a lot of the changes to the interface in
Vista and Office 2007 seem to be change for the sake of it which makes it
much more difficult to use for experienced users.  I understood that the
Windows layouts, keystrokes, etc were the result of extensive research in
the M$ usability labs in the 90's - are they implying that their results
were totally wrong?

John Weller
01380 723235
07976 393631




[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to