On that front, has anyone played with OO.o V3.0 and it's ability to read Office 2007 documents? I haven't upgraded yet as I have trained most people with Office 2007 to send me *.doc and *.xls files. <eg> OO.o consumes those just fine.
-Kevin CULLY Technologies, LLC David Smith wrote: > Sometimes I think those sort of changes were done primarily as a response to > the rise of OpenOffice, to differentiate their product from Sun's. A new > look is a good way to help people feel better about tossing down new money > as well. The ribbon concept is good, but I think they dropped the ball by > not making it optional and they certainly didn't make it easy to program for > in Visual Studio. I also think they made an mistake defaulting to the new .x > formats ( docs, xlsx and so on) in Office. I get the xml concept and think > it's a brilliant idea, but they would have done better to not instantly > abandon a format with a decade+ of history and user comfort. > > Thanks, > Dave _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
