Rick Schummer wrote: >>> Besides, disk space is cheap so there's no need to rely on the old approach >>> of having it exist in > one spot and using the registry for that reference.<< > > Depends. Some of us still prefer run times on client machine for performance. > In this case you > really should have them installed in common folder to make things simpler.
Not sure I'm understanding you fully---Are you saying that it would perform better if you had installed the runtimes in the common folder? I would think the opposite---that having them in the app folder itself would be quicker (if performance is anything measured different between the two). _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
