I'm just kidding about the upskirt pictures being ok
************************************************* 1/20/2013 Eviction Notice http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6169336 --- On Tue, 1/27/09, Geoff Flight <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Geoff Flight <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: [OT] Stupid law of the year goes to congressman Peter King (R) > New York > To: "'ProFox Email List'" <[email protected]> > Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 6:03 PM > Breaching privacy but not being identifiable is hardly ok. > Some things are > just wrong - such as this. The camera sound idea tho is > just absurd. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Pete Theisen > Sent: Wednesday, 28 January 2009 9:23 AM > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: Re: [OT] Stupid law of the year goes to > congressman Peter King (R) > New York > > Michael Madigan wrote: > > 1. I photograph many times where the sound of a > camera is inappropriate. > Concerts, weddings, etc. > > > > 2. Covering the speaker on the camera will circumvent > any laws. > > > > 3. What's wrong with upskirt photos? LOL > > Hi Michael! > > If the skirt wearer has clean underwear on and is not > recognizable in > the picture then it is merely tasteless. > -- > Regards, > > Pete > http://pete-theisen.com/ > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
