No triggers, SPs or RV. Good thought, however.
Gil Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T -----Original Message----- From: "William Sanders / EFG" <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 13:52:13 To: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: SQLServer 2005 reading VFP v-7 tables (in .dbc) Gil - I'd suggest a quick test... set up a table in sql server exactly like the 'other one' in sql server, but don't put any triggers or RI in it at all. Try the CSV import again, using the newly created sql table. If you get 100 percent on the record count, then the original sql table is suspect - there's a trigger or RI rule that's throwing out the records in the original import. -- William Sanders / efGroup _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. Report [OT] Abuse: http://leafe.com/reportAbuse/[email protected] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/2030073744-1237435580-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-2381224...@bxe1165.bisx.prod.on.blackberry ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
