Pete Theisen wrote:
> Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
> 
>> The effort devoted to proofing and spell checking an email, before I 
>> send it, is dependant on how much time I have available.
> 
> Hi Leland!
> 
> So you don't have time? Why post anything if you don't have time to do 
> it right?

I'm talking about informal email and text message conversations, Pete,
so I'm not going to try and put the same effort into my email writing,
as some neurotics perfectionist might.  LOL  Don't misunderstand me.  I
do appreciate an occasional constructive criticism from you regarding
correct spelling and word use.

> 
>> Besides, incorrect use of homonyms, proper spelling, proper 
>> punctuation, or even using complete words is losing relevance in this 
>> new age of emailing and instant messaging.
> 
> No it isn't. The people who don't bother to do it right - THEY are 
> losing relevance.

Twitter only allow 140 characters per message, so a whole new written
language is growing up around twitter and other similar technologies,
where communication efficiencies take precedent over more technically
correct English usage.

> 
> Oh, the people who prattle on about you-can't-understand-what may sway 
> an election, but "The One" they elect forgets both them and their 
> interest once in office.

I have not been disappointed in President Obama, and I'm looking forward
to many wonderful things coming from President Obama and his
Administration, and the Democratic majority in congress.  LOL

Regards,

LelandJ




_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to