Carl: On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Carl Lindner <[email protected]> wrote: > Madigan said... > >> Too bad he's not going to click on it, Carl. LMAO >> > Mike, I am enjoying another martini just waiting for Calco's "little kitten" > to show his face. So, we finally learned what drives Publius! Silly me. I > always believed Bob's motivation was above teasing a "little kitten"! > > But I promised to do some research. Remember Ricardo said: > > To whom are you talking? "hacked emails"???? Did you copy this last sentence > from a movie script? Are you high? > > So I offered: > > http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/28/science/earth/28hack.html?_r=1&scp=3&sq=cl > imate%20change%20email&st=cs > > Hacked E-Mail Data Prompts Calls for Changes in Climate Research Sign in to > Recommend By ANDREW C. REVKIN > Published: November 27, 2009 > > Mr. Macho did not respond. > > How about: > > http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/21/science/earth/21climate.html?scp=1&sq=clim > ate%20change%20email&st=cse > > Hacked E-Mail Is New Fodder for Climate Dispute > ANDREW C. REVKIN > Published: November 20, 2009 > > Hundreds of private e-mail messages and documents hacked from a computer > server at a British university are causing a stir among global warming > skeptics, who say they show that climate scientists conspired to overstate > the case for a human influence on climate change. > > The e-mail messages, attributed to prominent American and British climate > researchers, include discussions of scientific data and whether it should be > released, exchanges about how best to combat the arguments of skeptics, and > casual comments - in some cases derisive - about specific people known for > their skeptical views. Drafts of scientific papers and a photo collage that > portrays climate skeptics on an ice floe were also among the hacked data, > some of which dates back 13 years. > > In one e-mail exchange, a scientist writes of using a statistical "trick" in > a chart illustrating a recent sharp warming trend. In another, a scientist > refers to climate skeptics as "idiots." > ----- > > As far as I can see both are from the New York Times. Or, maybe they > figured out John Harvey's trick for spoofing! > > I am new to this. Just where is Calco's little kitten. If he reads every > page of the Times how did the little kitten miss these?
We recently acquire 2 new cats. The first, Vaska (the typical name for an alley cat in Russia), and the second, Mario. Vaska was completely wild, a street cat from Day One, and nothing but skin and bones when we "rescued" him and gave him a warm home in which to live, eat, sleep. The second, Mario, we adopted after we found him at the base of the tree in which poor Vaska had lost himself for two days. Mario apparently was previously loved by a family but somehow got lost or was abandoned. He's a lovable cat, very tolerant of all our other cats, and exceedingly well-tempered. Vaska, however, has some "forgiveness issues" toward Mario. Apparently, Mario had frightened Vaska into the tree. Vaska heretofore had been the ultimate fighting cat, with a meow as ferocious as anything a racoon could muster, but he found his match, and then some, in Mario. All would be well if Vaska ignored Mario, but no, he has to "make a stand," and "protect home and hearth" from the dangerous Mario. Now we have accepted both, but Vaska rejects Mario, and continuously gets his ass pummeled by Mario in head-to-head fighting matches, always initiated by Vaska. It takes him typically three days to heal from the scratches and gashes left by Mario's much bigger claws. There's a parable in here somewhere. Henceforth I shall call Ricardo by his new "kitten" name, Vaska. - Publius "Mario" Maximus > > Carl > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
