Publius Maximus wrote: > BTW, I will give credit to Ricardo for one thing (no, not the alleged > fact he doesn't stoop to name calling---a simple text search in Ed's > archives can disprove that fiction). > > I am referring to this: When he has marked a particular conversation > as serious, such as our suspended thread on the question of whether > socialism is a valid perspective on the continuum between anarchy and > totalitarianism, he does not pee in the water without apologizing, out > of respect for the seriousness of the conversation. Nor does he dip in > the water when he's not fully prepared to be a sincere participant. > > Other than that he feels free to fling poo this way and that, but he > *does* respect the inner sanctum of an actual civil discussion. At > least so far. > Signed Minimus Dickus! Hahahahhaahaha!
(there you are! Just disrespected the "inner sanctum" of your civil discussion by ONLY name calling) _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
