The American television networks didn't cover it, I suspect that Argentina television didn't cover it either.
If I weren't tuned into conservative media I may not have heard it either. --- On Mon, 11/30/09, Carl Lindner <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Carl Lindner <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: [OT] Oops! Climate Change Data Dumped > To: "'ProFox Email List'" <[email protected]> > Date: Monday, November 30, 2009, 12:22 AM > Madigan said... > > > Too bad he's not going to click on it, Carl. > LMAO > > > Mike, I am enjoying another martini just waiting for > Calco's "little kitten" > to show his face. So, we finally learned what drives > Publius! Silly me. I > always believed Bob's motivation was above teasing a > "little kitten"! > > But I promised to do some research. Remember Ricardo > said: > > To whom are you talking? "hacked emails"???? Did you copy > this last sentence > from a movie script? Are you high? > > So I offered: > > http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/28/science/earth/28hack.html?_r=1&scp=3&sq=cl > imate%20change%20email&st=cs > > Hacked E-Mail Data Prompts Calls for Changes in Climate > Research Sign in to > Recommend By ANDREW C. REVKIN > Published: November 27, 2009 > > Mr. Macho did not respond. > > How about: > > http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/21/science/earth/21climate.html?scp=1&sq=clim > ate%20change%20email&st=cse > > Hacked E-Mail Is New Fodder for Climate Dispute > ANDREW C. REVKIN > Published: November 20, 2009 > > Hundreds of private e-mail messages and documents hacked > from a computer > server at a British university are causing a stir among > global warming > skeptics, who say they show that climate scientists > conspired to overstate > the case for a human influence on climate change. > > The e-mail messages, attributed to prominent American and > British climate > researchers, include discussions of scientific data and > whether it should be > released, exchanges about how best to combat the arguments > of skeptics, and > casual comments - in some cases derisive - about specific > people known for > their skeptical views. Drafts of scientific papers and a > photo collage that > portrays climate skeptics on an ice floe were also among > the hacked data, > some of which dates back 13 years. > > In one e-mail exchange, a scientist writes of using a > statistical "trick" in > a chart illustrating a recent sharp warming trend. In > another, a scientist > refers to climate skeptics as "idiots." > ----- > > As far as I can see both are from the New York Times. > Or, maybe they > figured out John Harvey's trick for spoofing! > > I am new to this. Just where is Calco's little > kitten. If he reads every > page of the Times how did the little kitten miss these? > > Carl > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Post Messages to: [email protected] > Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/000101ca717d$28d83870$7a88a9...@com > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are > the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or > medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for > those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. > _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
